Immediate Results of the Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Modified Technique for Provisional Stenting of Bifurcation Lesions of Coronary Arteries
https://doi.org/10.24884/1682-6655-2025-24-2-27-34
Abstract
Introduction. Stenting of bifurcation lesions of the coronary arteries is a pressing issue in interventional cardiology that requires constant adaptation to modern technical advances and patient needs. Optimized treatment methods should take into account morphological features, the potential for plaque formation in the main vessel and in the side branch; ensure long-term efficacy and a low risk of restenosis in the distant period. Objective. To evaluate the immediate results of surgical treatment of bifurcation lesions of the coronary arteries using a modified provisional stenting technique. Materials and methods. In three groups of patients with bifurcation lesions of the coronary arteries, provisional stenting was performed using classical generally accepted techniques (side branch dilation with proximal optimization in the first group and kissing dilation with proximal optimization in the second) and a modified technique i. e. local post-dilation of the stent cell with proximal optimization was used in the third group. After the surgery, we performed OCT control, analyzed in-hospital complications and the following parameters: stenosis of the main and side branches (OCT MB and SB, %); diameter of the main branch (mm); malposition of stent struts (%). Results. When comparing the frequency of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), angiographic success in MB and SB, MB predilation, transition to a two-stent technique, as well as the number of stents and guidewires used during the intervention, no statistically significant differences were found in the compared groups. However, when using the modified technique, there was a tendency to reduce the time of X-ray radiation (p=0.37) and the number of balloon catheters used (p=0.55), as well as a decrease in the percentage of malpositioned struts (p=0.31) according to the results of OCT control in comparison with classical techniques. Conclusion. The proposed modified technique of provisional stenting of bifurcation lesions of the coronary arteries is comparable in efficiency and applicability with classical, generally accepted methods of provisional stenting, and also demonstrates ease of implementation and safety in the medium term. The technique demonstrates better geometry of the stented section of neobifurcation; it allows to reduce the risk of thrombosis in the early postoperative period due to complete and optimal adhesion of the stent to the artery.
About the Authors
A. K. BazunovRussian Federation
Bazunov Alexey K. – X-ray Endovascular Surgeon, Department of X-ray Diagnostic and Treatment Methods №1, Research Institute of Surgery and Emergency Medicine
6-8, L’va Tolstogo str., Saint Petersburg, 197022
A. V. Biryukov
Russian Federation
Biryukov Alexey V. – Cand. (PhD) of Sci (Med.), Head, Department of X-ray Surgical Diagnostic and Treatment Methods №1, Research Institute of Surgery and Emergency Medicine
6-8, L’va Tolstogo str., Saint Petersburg, 197022
A. Yu. Pelipas
Russian Federation
Pelipas Alexey Yu. – X-ray Endovascular Surgeon, Department of X-ray Diagnostic and Treatment Methods № 1, Research Institute of Surgery and Emergency Medicine
6-8, L’va Tolstogo str., Saint Petersburg, 197022
G. G. Khubulava
Russian Federation
Khubulava Gennadii G. – Doctor of Med. Sc., Professor, Member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Head, Department of Faculty Surgery
6-8, L’va Tolstogo str., Saint Petersburg, 197022
A. A. Furgal
Russian Federation
Furgal Aleksey A. – Cand. (PhD) Of Sci (Med.), Head, Department of Cardiac Surgery and Vascular Surgery, Medical Complex
10, o. Russkij, p. Ayaks, Vladivostok, 690922
M. S. Annaev
Russian Federation
Annaev Meylis S. – Doctor in X-ray Endovascular Diagnostics and Treatment, Department of Cardiac Surgery and Vascular Surgery, Medical Complex
10, o. Russkij, p. Ayaks, Vladivostok, 690922
References
1. Jagannathan R, Patel SA, Ali MK, Narayan KMV. Global Updates on Cardiovascular Disease Mortality Trends and Attribution of Traditional Risk Factors. Current Diabetes Reports. 2019;19(7):44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-019-1161-2.
2. Khan MA, Hashim MJ, Mustafa H, et al. Global Epidemiology of Ischemic Heart Disease: Results from the Global Burden of Disease Study. Cureus. 2020;12(7):e9349. https:// doi.org/10.7759/cureus.9349.
3. Eraliev TK, Khelimskii DA, Badoian AG, Krestyaninov OV. Coronary bifurcation lesions: Current techniques for endovascular treatment. Patologiya krovoobrashcheniya i kardiokhirurgiya. 25(2):38-49. (In Russ). https://doi.org/10.21688/1681-3472-2021-2-38-49.
4. Aedma SK, Naik A, Kanmanthareddy A. Coronary Bifurcation Stenting: Review of Current Techniques and Evidence. Current cardiology reviews. 2023;19(1):e060422203185. https://doi.org/10.2174/1573403X18666220406113517.
5. Mortier P, Hikichi Y, Foin N, et al. Provisional stenting of coronary bifurcations: insights into final kissing balloon post-dilation and stent design by computational modeling. JACC. Cardiovascular interventions. 2014;7(3):325–333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2013.09.012.
6. Darremont AR, Mortier P, Louvard Y. Technical aspects of the provisional side branch stenting strategy. EuroIntervention. 2015;11:86-90. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV11SVA19.
7. Chen E, Cai W, Chen LL. Crush versus Culotte stenting techniques for coronary bifurcation lesions: A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical trials with long-term followup. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019;98(14):e14865. https://doi.org/10.1097/MD.0000000000014865.
8. Seth A, Singh VP. Intervention in coronary bifurcation lesions: Staying on top of the proximal optimization technique (POT). Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2020;96(1):40-41. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.29078.
9. Andreasen LN, Holm NR, Webber B, Ormiston JA. Critical aspects of balloon position during final proximal optimization technique (POT) in coronary bifurcation stenting. Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions: official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions. 2020;96(1):31-39. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.28801.
10. Foin N, Secco GG, Ghilencea L, et al. Final proximal post‐dilatation is necessary after kissing balloon in bifurcation stenting. EuroIntervention. 2011;7(5):597‐604. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJV7I5A96.
11. Lassen JF, Burzotta F, Banning AP, et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention for the left main stem and other bifurcation lesions: 12th consensus document from the European Bifurcation Club. EuroIntervention. 2018;13(13):1540‐1553. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00622.
12. Nomura T, Wada N, Ota I, et al. Inflation Pressure in Side Branch during Modified Jailed Balloon Technique Does Not Affect Side Branch Outcomes. Journal of interventional cardiology. 2021:8839897. https://doi.org/10.1155/2021/8839897.
13. Dérimay F, Finet G, Souteyrand G, et al. Benefit of a new provisional stenting strategy, the re-proximal optimisation technique: the rePOT clinical study. EuroIntervention: journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology. 2018;14(3):325-332. https://doi.org/10.4244/EIJ-D-17-00941.
14. Sawaya FJ, Lefèvre T, Chevalier B, et al. Contemporary Approach to Coronary Bifurcation Lesion Treatment. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;9(18):1861-78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcin.2016.06.056.
15. Jang WJ, Ahn SG, Song YB, et al. Benefit of Prolonged Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Implantation of Drug-Eluting Stent for Coronary Bifurcation Lesions: Results From the Coronary Bifurcation Stenting Registry II. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2018;11(7):e005849. https://doi.org/10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.117.005849.
Review
For citations:
Bazunov A.K., Biryukov A.V., Pelipas A.Yu., Khubulava G.G., Furgal A.A., Annaev M.S. Immediate Results of the Evaluation of the Effectiveness of the Modified Technique for Provisional Stenting of Bifurcation Lesions of Coronary Arteries. Regional blood circulation and microcirculation. 2025;24(2):27-34. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/1682-6655-2025-24-2-27-34