Modern Concepts of Maintaining Functional Capacity of Autologous Radial Artery Vascular Grafts Used in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (review)
https://doi.org/10.24884/1682-6655-2026-25-1-4-14
Abstract
This review summarizes studies on radial artery autograft vasospasms in coronary artery bypass grafting, and analyzes possible causes of grafted artery vasospasm. Coronary artery bypass grafting has proven the most effective method for correcting the consequences of coronary heart disease. Spasmophilia of arterial bypass grafts in the intraand postoperative period is currently amenable to pharmacological control. Arterial spasms are mediated by the tonic activity of smooth muscle cells in the vessel media in response to many different factors. The exact mechanisms of spasms and the reasons for their development remain unclear; however, clinical practice requires assessment of the functional bypass graft viability. The review analyzes possible causes of radial artery conduit vasospasms and existing methods for controlling the tone of arterial bypass grafts. Research in this area may expand the indications for the use of arterial bypass grafts and predict their long-term functional viability.
About the Authors
E. A. GolovanovRussian Federation
Golovanov Egor A. – Junior researcher, Research Institute of Cardiology.
111-A, Kiyevskaya str., Tomsk, 634012
S. A. Afanasyev
Russian Federation
Afanasyev Sergey A. – Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Professor; Head, Laboratory of Molecular Cell Pathology and Gene Diagnostics, Research Institute of Cardiology.
111-A, Kiyevskaya str., Tomsk, 634012
V. V. Zatolokin
Russian Federation
Zatolokin Vasily V. – Candidate (PhD) of Medical Sciences, Researcher, Research Institute of Cardiology.
111-A, Kiyevskaya str., Tomsk, 634012
D. S. Kondratieva
Russian Federation
Kondratieva Dina S. – Dr. of Sci. (Med.), Senior Researcher, Research Institute of Cardiology.
111-A, Kiyevskaya str., Tomsk, 634012
References
1. Vaisman DSh, Enina EN. Coronary artery disease mortality rates in the RussianFederation and a number of regions: dynamics and structure specifics. Cardiovascular Therapy and Prevention. 2024;23(7):23–30. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.15829/1728-8800-2024-3975.
2. Malygina NA, Kostomarova IV, Melentyev IA, et al. Molecular and genetic markers for coronary heart disease prognosis in elderly patients. RussianJournal of Cardiology. 2009;14(4):68–72. (In Russ.).
3. Boytsov SA, Zayratiants OV, Andreev EM, Samorodskaya IV. Comparison of coronary heart disease mortality in men and women age 50 years and older in Russia and USA. RussianJournal of Cardiology. 2017;22(6):100–107. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2017-6-100-107.
4. Zotov AS, Anokhin AV, Arinchev RS, et al. Grafts for coronary surgery. Clinical practice. 2015; (2(22)):35–45. (In Russ.).
5. Ripp TM, Kondrat’eva DS, Mordovin VF, et al. Consistence of the radial artery as a conduit used in aortocoronary bypass surgery, a possibility of preventing shunt spasm. Therapeutic archive. 2012;84(12):13–17. (In Russ.).
6. Muradov AG, Efendiev VU, Andin AV, et al. The history of coronary surgery development. Siberian Medical Review. 2021;(3(129)):15–25. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.20333/25000136-2021-3-15-25.
7. Ambrus N, Szolnoky J, Pollesello P, et al. Prolonged antispasmodic effect in isolated radial artery graft and pronounced platelet inhibition induced by the inodilator drug, levosimendan. Basic Clin Pharmacol Toxicol. 2012;110:269–74. Doi: 10.1111/j.1742-7843.2011.00801.
8. Kazanchyan PO, Popov VA, Sotnikov PG, et al. The state of autoarterial grafts in the early periods after direct myocardial revascularization. Russianjournal of Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2011;(3):4–8. (In Russ.).
9. Isaev MN, Ekimov SS, Chernov II, et al. Off-pump revascularization with a bilateral internal mammary artery via left minithoracotomy. Clinical and experimental surgery. Petrovsky journal. 2016;4(4(14)):27–30. (In Russ.).
10. Mikhaylov KM, Kuznetsov DV, Khokhlunov SM, et al. Period of safe use of radial artery in coronary artery bypass surgery after previous catheterization. Journal of cardiology and cardiovascular surgery. 2021;14(2):145–148. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.17116/kardio202114021145.
11. Umetov MA, Sokurov IA, Khakuasheva IA, et al. Investigation of the mechanisms through which endothelial dysfunction may contribute to the development of cardiovascular complications in patients with arterial hypertension. Medicine. Sociology. Philosophy. Applied research. 2023;(6):78–82. (In Russ.).
12. Matchin YuG, Atanesyan RV, Basinkevich AB, et al. First experience of new catheterization technique: ulnar artery catheterization in diagnostic and treatment procedures in patients with coronary arteries disease. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology. 2012;6(2):67–78. (In Russ.).
13. Patent RU 2421139, IPC A61B 8/00. Method for non-invasive assessment of the functional capacity of the radial artery for use as a vascular bypass graft during coronary artery bypass grafting / Afanasyev SA, Ripp TM, Kozlov BN, Kondratieva DS, Mordovin VF, Shipulin VM; Institution of the RussianAcademy of Medical Sciences, Research Institute of Cardiology, Siberian Branch of the RussianAcademy of Medical Sciences. No. 2009124194/14; declared June 24, 2009; published June 20, 2011. (In Russ.).
14. Ivanova EP. Morpho-functional characteristics of the radial artery in patients with ischemic heart disease: specialty 14.00.0614.00.15 [autoabstr. of cand. med. sci. thesis]. St. Petersburg; 2008. 20 p. (In Russ.).
15. Sulava EF, Johnson JC. Management of Coronary Artery Disease. Surg Clin North Am. 2022 Jun;102(3):449–464. Doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2022.01.005.
16. Semchenko AN, Galyautdinov DM, Vasiliev VP, Bondar VYu. Sequential bypass grafting in coronary surgery [literature review]. Siberian Medical Journal (Tomsk). 2012;27(4):13–19. (In Russ.).
17. Bazylev VV, Tungusov DS, Mikulyak AI, et al. Comparative analysis of immediate results of composite and aortocoronary bypass grafting of the right coronary artery basin. Thoracic and cardiovascular surgery. 2022;64(3):273–280. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.24022/0236-2791-2022-64-3-273-280.
18. Shabaev IF, Kozyrin KA, Tarasov RS. Clinical case of multivessel minimally invasive coronary artery bypass grafting within the framework of hybrid complete myocardial revascularization. Pathology of blood circulation and cardiac surgery. 2020;24(3S):108–118. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.21688/1681-3472-2020-3S-108-118.
19. Glineur D, Hanet C. Competitive flow in coronary bypass surgery: is it a problem? Curr Opin Cardiol. 2012 Nov; 27(6):620–8. Doi: 10.1097/HCO.0b013e3283583000.
20. Belov YuV, Svidinskaya EA, Lysenko AV, et al. Results of surgical treatment of coronary heart disease in postmenopausal patients. Cardiology and cardiovascular surgery. 2019;12(6):489–493. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.17116/kardio201912061489.
21. Hubert A, Seitz A, Pereyra VM, et al. Coronary artery spasm: the interplay between endothelial dysfunction and vascular smooth muscle cell hyperreactivity. Eur Cardiol. 2020 Apr 6;15:e12. Doi: 10.15420/ecr.2019.20.
22. Kazaryan AV, Sigaev IYu, Chigogidze NA, Pilipenko IV. Frequency and timing of return of myocardial ischemia after coronary bypass surgery, depending on the type used by the grafts and the primary operation. Clinical physiology of blood circulation. 2019;16(2):104–114. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.24022/1814-69102019-16-2-104-114.
23. Simry W, Afifi A. Radial artery as a second conduit gains momentum: the RAPCO trial. Glob Cardiol Sci Pract. 2021 Jun 30;2021(2):e202110. Doi: 10.21542/gcsp.2021.10.
24. Hu Z, Dai M, Chang Y, et al. Strategies for arterial graft optimization at the single-cell level. Nat Cardiovasc Res. 2024 May;3(5):541–557. Doi: 10.1038/s44161-024-00464-6.
25. Stojnic N, Bukarica L, Peric M, et al. Analysis of vasoreactivity of isolated human radial artery. J Pharmacol Sci. 2006 Jan;100(1):34–40. Doi: 10.1254/jphs.fpe05004x.
26. Kim KB, Hwang SW, Kim MS. Techniques and outcomes of the no-touch vein conduit as a y-composite graft. Braz J Cardiovasc Surg. 2022 Sep 2;37(Spec 1):38–41. Doi: 10.21470/1678-9741-2022-0119.
27. Elshafay A, Bendary AH, Vuong HT, et al. Does notouch technique better than conventional or intermediate saphenous vein harvest techniques for coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Transl Res. 2018 Dec;11(6):483–494. Doi: 10.1007/s12265-018-9832-y.
28. Gonzalez-Gay M, Lopez-Martinez R, Busto-Suarez S, et al. Immunological aspects involved in the degeneration of cryopreserved arterial allografts. Front Surg. 2020 Dec 22; 7:616654. Doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2020.616654.
29. Achouha P, Isselmoua KO, Boutekadjirtb R, et al. Reappraisal of a 20-year experience with the radial artery as a conduit for coronary bypass grafting. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012;41:87–92. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2011.05.027.
30. Grebennik VK, Kucherenko VS, Fan H, Gordeev ML. Prediction of angina recurrence in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. Bulletin of the National Medical and Surgical Center named after N. I. Pirogov. 2018;13(3):11–15. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.25881/BPNMSC.2018.29.69.002.
31. Visker YaYu, Molchanov AN, Kovalchuk DN, Urvantseva IA. Surgical approaches to performing coronary endarterectomy in combination with coronary artery bypass grafting. Bulletin of Surgut State University. Medicine. 2020;(1(43)):15–22. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.34822/2304-9448-2020-1-15-22.
32. Neumann FJ, Sousa-Uva M, Ahlsson A, et al. 2018 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on myocardial revascularization. EuroIntervention. 2019 Feb 20;14(14):1435–1534. Doi: 10.4244/EIJY19M01_01.
33. Mіynarska E, Czarnik W, Fularski P, et al. From atherosclerotic plaque to myocardial infarction – the leading cause of coronary artery occlusion. Int J Mol Sci. 2024 Jul 2;25(13):7295. Doi: 10.3390/ijms25137295.
34. Kitamura S. Physiological and metabolic effects of grafts in coronary artery bypass surgery. Circ J. 2011;75(4):766–72. Doi: 10.1253/circj.cj-10-1302.
35. Gusakova SV, Rydchenko VS, Smagliy LV, et al. Volume-dependent regulation of contractile activity of smooth muscle cells of the vessels of the pulmonary circulation. Crimean Journal of Experimental and Clinical Medicine. 2019;9(2):5–11. (In Russ.).
36. Gusakova SV, Rydchenko VS, Smagliy LV, et al. Study of volume-dependent mechanisms of regulation of contractile function of smooth muscle cells of the rat pulmonary artery. VI Congress of RussianBiophysicists. 2019;1:206–207. (In Russ.).
37. Park SW, Shin KC, Park HJ, et al. Caveolar remodeling is a critical mechanotransduction mechanism of the stretchinduced L-type Ca2+ channel activation in vascular myocytes. Pflugers Arch. 2017;469(5-6):829–842. Doi: 10.1007/s00424017-1957-3.
38. Smagliy LV, Gusakova VS, Goryanova AM, et al. The role of ATP and Clion transporters in the regulation of contractile activity of pulmonary artery smooth muscles in a hypo-osmotic environment. Arterial hypertension. 2020;26(5):573–580. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.18705/1607-419X-2020-26-5-573-580.
39. Gur DO, Gur O, Gurkan S, et al. Comparison of endothelial function of coronary artery bypass grafts in diabetic and nondiabetic patients: Which graft offers the best? Anatol J Cardiol. 2015 Aug;15(8):657–62. Doi: 10.5152/akd.2014.5613.
40. Dusting GJ, Macdonald PS. Endogenous nitric oxide in cardiovascular disease and transplantation. Ann Med. 1995 Jun;27(3):395–406. Doi: 10.3109/07853899509002593.
41. Kolesnikov SI, Vlasov BYa, Kolesnikova LI. Hydrogen sulfide as the third essential gas molecule of living tissues. Bulletin of the RussianAcademy of Medical Sciences. 2015;70(2):237–241. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.15690/vramn.v70i2.1318.
42. Dashwood MR, Loesch A. Endothelin-1, endothelin receptor antagonists, and vein graft occlusion in coronary artery bypass surgery: 20 years on and still no journey from bench to bedside. Can J Physiol Pharmacol. 2020 Sep;98(9):570–578. Doi: 10.1139/cjpp-2019-0598.
43. Kapilevich LV, Kovalev IV, Baskakov MB, Medvedev MA. Intracellular signaling systems in epitheliumand endothelium-dependent processes of smooth muscle relaxation. Advances in Physiological Sciences. 2001;32(2):88–98. (In Russ.).
44. Sakakibara M, Kodama A, Komori K, Itoh T. Reduced function of endothelial nitric oxide and hyperpolarization in artery grafts with poor runoff. J Surg Res. 2022 Feb;270:2–11. Doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.08.031.
45. Gemelli M, Gallo M, Addonizio M, et al. Venous external support in coronary artery bypass surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Curr Probl Cardiol. 2023 Jul; 48(7):101687. Doi: 10.1016/j.cpcardiol.2023.101687.
46. Wilson JN, Dang C, Reddy N, et al. Bioengineering strategies for treating neointimal hyperplasia in peripheral vasculature: innovations and challenges. Adv Healthc Mater. 2025 Mar;14(7):e2401056. Doi: 10.1002/adhm.202401056.
47. Krepkogorsky NV, Bredikhin RA. Modern methods of preparing autovein for bypass operations [non-systematic revie]. RussianMedical and Biological Bulletin named after Academician I. P. Pavlov. 2024;32(4):669–680. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.17816/PAVLOVJ321630.
48. Overbey JR, Raymond S, Chang H, Bagiella E. Handling non-ignorable missing intimal hyperplasia data – lessons from the VEST trial. Contemp Clin Trials. 2025 May;152:107878. Doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2025.107878.
49. Niclauss L. Techniques and standards in intraoperative graft verification by transit time flow measurement after coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a critical review. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2017 Jan;51(1):26–33. Doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw203.
50. Anand PA, Keshavamurthy S, Shelley EM, Saha S. Does age affect the shortand long-term outcomes of coronary bypass grafting? Int J Angiol. 2021 Aug 25;30(3):202–211. Doi: 10.1055/s-0041-1735221.
51. Kubova MCh, Bulaeva NI, Ruzina EV, Golukhova EZ. Risk factors for the development of bypass graft thrombosis in patients with coronary artery disease in the late stages after coronary artery bypass grafting. Creative cardiology. 2021;15(2):180–193. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.24022/1997-3187-2021-15-2-180-193.
52. Masroor M, Ahmad A, Wang Y, Dong N. Assessment of the graft quality and patency during and after coronary artery bypass grafting. Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 May 29; 13(11):1891. Doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13111891.
53. Praz F, Borger MA, Lanz J, et al. ESC/EACTS Scientific Document Group. 2025 ESC/EACTS Guidelines for the management of valvular heart disease. Eur Heart J. 2025 Aug 29:ehaf194. Doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaf194.
54. Sigaev IYu, Keren MA. Current clinical guidelines for the use of arterial conduits in surgery for coronary heart disease. Annals of surgery. 2018;23(5):271–277. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.18821/15609502-2018-23-5-271-277.
55. Lawton JS, Tamis-Holland JE, Bangalore S, et al. 2021 ACC/AHA/SCAI Guideline for coronary artery revascularization: a report of the American college of cardiology /American heart association joint committee on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2024 Aug 20;84(8):771. Doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2024.07.010.
56. Savello AV, Voznyuk AV, Svistov DV. Intravascular treatment of ischemic stroke in the acute period (clinical guidelines of the Association of Neurosurgeons of Russia): [clinical guidelines]. St. Petersburg: Association of Neurosurgeons of Russia; 2015. 36 p. (In Russ.).
57. Li YF, Zhang Y, Chen L, et al. Diagnosis of coronary artery spasm by ergonovine provocation test of radial artery. Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 12;11(1):3767. Doi: 10.1038/s41598-02183356-0.
58. Patent RU 2481059: IPC A61B 5/026. Method for intraoperative examination of coronary bypass grafts / Baraev OV, Zotov AS, Ilyin MV, Mayorov VV, Serebryansky YuB, Staroverov IN; applicant and patent holder Yaroslavl State Medical Academy of the Ministry of Health and Social Development of the RussianFederation. No. 2011140917/14; declared October 7, 2011; published May 10, 2013. EDN QMQCVB.
59. Kieser TM, Taggart DP. The use of intraoperative graft assessment in guiding graft revision. Ann. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2018;7(5):652–662. Doi: 10.21037/acs.2018.07.06.
60. Kochergin NA, Zagorodnikov NI, Frolov AV, et al. Optical coherence tomography as a method for assessing the conduit – anastomosis – artery system in patients after coronary artery bypass grafting. Complex problems of cardiovascular diseases. 2022;11(4):151–157. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.17802/2306-1278-2022-11-4-151-157.
61. Schneider YuA, Isayan MV, Antipov GN, et al. Analysis of the results of bypass imaging after coronary artery bypass grafting. Cardiology. 2018;58(6):44–50. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.18087/cardio.2018.6.10132.
62. Kiyabaev AM, Egemberdiev TZh, Kodasbaev AT, et al. Analysis of fractional blood flow reserve in patients after percutaneous coronary artery bypass grafting. Bulletin of the Kazakh National Medical University. 2022; (1):140–145. (In Russ.).
63. Bogdanov LA, Velikanova EA, Kanonykina AYu, et al. Vascular smooth muscle cell contractile proteins as universal markers of vessels of microcirculatory bed. Complex problems of cardiovascular diseases. 2022;11(3):162–176. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.17802/2306-1278-2022-11-3-162-176.
64. Gaudino M, Benedetto U, Fremes SE, et al. Effect of calcium-channel blocker therapy on radial artery grts after coronary bypass surgery. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019;73:2299–306. Doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.054.
65. Bockeria OL, Akhobekov AA. Ion channels and their role in the development of arrhythmias. Annals of arrhythmology. 2014;11(3):176–184. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.15275/annaritmol.2014.3.6.
66. Zatolokin VV, Vechersky YuYu, Manvelyan DV, Kozlov BN. Role of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers in coronary bypass surgery using the radial artery graft. RussianJournal of Cardiology. 2022;27(8):80–84. (In Russ.). Doi: 10.15829/1560-4071-2022-4744.
67. Bou J, Llenas J, Massingham R. Calcium entry blocking drugs, ‘calcium antagonists’ and vascular smooth muscle function. J Auton Pharmacol. 1983 Sep;3(3):219–32. Doi: 10.1111/j.1474-8673.1983.tb00538.x.
68. Afanasyev SA, Kozlov BN, Korovin NV, Shipulin VM. Inhibition of calmodulin prevents spasms in autologous arterial bypass grafts during coronary disease surgery. Human Physiology. 2006;32(6):38–41. (In Russ.).
69. Shipulin VM, Kozlov BN, Nasrashvili GG, et al. Prevention of radial artery autoplast spasm in coronary artery bypass grafting. Clinical and experimental surgery. 2016;4(4(14)):12-15. (In Russ.).
70. Асar С, Jebara VA, Portoghese M, et al. Revival of the radial artery for coronary artery bypass grafting. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1992;54:652–659. Doi: 10.1016/0003-4975(92)91007-v.
71. He GW, Yang CQ. Use of verapamil and nitroglycerin solution in preparation of radial artery for coronary grafting. Ann. Thorac. Surg. 1996;61:610–614. Doi: 10.1016/00034975(95)00920-5.
72. Ding R, Feng W, Li H, et al. A comparative study on in vitro and in vivo effects of topical vasodilators in human internal mammary, radial artery and great saphenous vein. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2008;34:536–541. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2008.05.050.
73. Dipp MA, Nye PC, Taggart DP. Phenoxybenzamine is more effective and less harmful than papaverine in the prevention of radial artery vasospasm. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2001;11:482–486. Doi: 10.1016/s1010-7940(01)00598-x.
74. Kerendi F, Halkos ME, Corvera JS, et al. Inhibition of myosin light chain kinase provides prolonged attenuation of radial artery vasospasm. Eur. J. Cardiothorac. Surg. 2004; 26:1149–1155. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.08.030.
75. Kuchmin AN, Cherkashin DV. Calcium antagonists: from history of creation to modern clinical practice. Medical Council. 2015;(17):48–54. (In Russ.).
Review
For citations:
Golovanov E.A., Afanasyev S.A., Zatolokin V.V., Kondratieva D.S. Modern Concepts of Maintaining Functional Capacity of Autologous Radial Artery Vascular Grafts Used in Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (review). Regional blood circulation and microcirculation. 2026;25(1):4-14. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.24884/1682-6655-2026-25-1-4-14
JATS XML





























