Endothelial shear rate, local and regional vascular stiffness in patients in different stages of atherogenesis

Introduction and purpose. Endothelial cells are subjected to biomechanical stress produced by the bloodstream and tunica media of the vessel. Vascular stiffness and endothelial shear stress have cooperative effects on the endothelial structure and function. However, the relationship of shear stress and arterial stiffness is still poorly understood. The purpose of the study was to assess the relationship of endothelial shear rate and both local and regional vascular stiffness in patients at different stages of the development of atherosclerosis. Methods. The study included 60 patients, 33 men and 27 women. The average age of patients was 54.8±11.7 years. Regional arterial stiffness was assessed by measurement of the pulse wave velocity in the arteries of elastic and muscular types. Local stiffness of the carotid arteries was characterized by Peterson elastic modulus, Young's modulus, stiffness index β, the deformation of the common carotid artery. Endothelial shear rate was measured at the site of the common carotid artery. Results. Average values of carotid endothelial shear rate were equal to 433±127 s-1. Reduced endothelial shear rate in the carotid arteries was associated with an increased Peterson modulus (r = -0.289; p = 0.025) and the stiffness index β (r = -0.280; p = 0.037), and moreover - with decreasing vascular distensibility (r = 0.288; p = 0.026) and deformation (r = 0.296; p = 0.024). Assessment of the relationship between endothelial shear rate and regional vascular stiffness showed weak statistically significant negative correlation of shear rate and PWVcf (r = -0.367; p = 0.014). Conclusion. In study subjects endothelial shear rate reduction in the area of the common carotid artery was associated with an increased Peterson modulus, stiffness index β, decreasing deformation of carotid arteries and increase in aortic stiffness.

скорость сдвига, сосудистая жесткость, атеросклероз, скорость распространения пульсовой волны, shear rate, vascular stiffness, atherosclerosis, pulse wave velocity

1. Антонова Л.В., Севостьянова В.В., Сейфалиан А.М. и др. Сравнительное тестирование in vitro биодеградируемых сосудистых имплантов для оценки перспективы использования в тканевой инженерии // Комплексные проблемы сердечно-сосудистых заболеваний. 2015. № 4. С. 34-41.

2. Генкель В.В., Салашенко А.О., Алексеева О.А. и др. Показатели эндотелиальной скорости сдвига у больных с атеросклеротическим поражением артерий каротидного бассейна // Атеросклероз и дислипидемии. 2016. № 2. С. 58-65.

3. Anssari-Benam A., Korakianitis T. Atherosclerotic plaques: is endothelial shear stress the only factor? // Med Hypotheses. 2013. Vol. 81. № 2. P. 235-239.

4. Bonetti P.O., Lerman L.O., Lerman A. Endothelial dysfunction - a marker of atherosclerotic risk // Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2003. № 23. P. 168-175.

5. Brown A.J., Teng Z., Evans P.C. et al. Role of biomechanical forces in the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis // Nat Rev Cardiol. 2016. Vol. 13. № 4. P 210-220.

6. Chatzizisis Y.S., Coskun A.U., Jonas M. et al. Role of endothelial shear stress in the natural history of coronary atherosclerosis and vascular remodeling: molecular, cellular, and vascular behavior // J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007. Vol. 26. № 49(25). P. 2379-2393.

7. Duivenvoorden R., Vanbavel E., de Groot E. et al. Endothelial Shear Stress A Critical Determinant of Arterial Remodeling and Arterial Stiffness in Humans-A Carotid 3.0-T MRI Study // Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010. Vol. 3. № 5. P. 578-585.

8. Gijsen F, van der Giessen A., van der Steen A. et al. Shear stress and advanced atherosclerosis in human coronary arteries // J Biomech. 2013. Vol. 18. № 46(2). P. 240-247.

9. Glagov S., Weisenberg E., Zarins C.K. et al. Compensatory enlargement of human atherosclerotic coronary arteries // N Engl J Med. 1987. Vol. 316. P. 1371-1375.

10. Harrison D.G., Widder J., Grumbach I. et al. Endothelial mechanotransduction, nitric oxide and vascular inflammation // J Intern Med. 2006. Vol. 259. P. 351-363.

11. He F., Hua L., Gao L. A Computational Model for Biomechanical Effects of Arterial Compliance Mismatch // Applied Bionics and Biomechanics. 2015. Vol. 2015. Article ID 213236. 6 p. (doi 10.1155/2015/213236).

12. Kohn J.C., Zhou D.W., Bordeleau F. et al. Cooperative effects of matrix stiffness andfluid shear stress on endothelial cell behavior // Biophys J. 2015. Vol. 3. № 108(3). P. 471-478.

13. Laurent S., Cockcroft J., Van Bortel L. et al. European Network for Non-invasive Investigation of Large Arteries. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications // Eur Heart J. 2006. Vol. 27. № 21. P. 2588-2605.

14. Lehoux S., Tedgui A. Signal transduction of mechanical stresses in the vascular wall // Hypertension. 1998. № 32. P. 338-345.

15. Li Y.S., Haga J.H., Chien S. Molecular basis of the effects of shear stress on vascular endothelial cells // J Biomech. 2005. № 38. P. 1949-1971.

16. Li S., Kim M., Shyy J.Y. Fluid shear stress activation of focal adhesion kinase. Linking to mitogen-activated protein kinases // J. Biol. Chem. 1997. Vol. 272. P. 30455-30462.

17. Rajzer M.W., Klocek M., Wojciechowska W. Relationship between, blood viscosity, shear stress and arterial stiffness in patients with arterial hypertension // Artery Research. 2007. Vol. 1, № 2, P. 65.

18. Schafer M., Kheyfets V.O., Schroeder J.D. et al. Main pulmonary arterial wall shear stress correlates with invasive hemodynamics and stiffness in pulmonary hypertension // Pulmonary Circulation. 2016. Vol. 6. № 1. P. 37-45.

19. Widlansky M.E., Gokce N., Keaney J.F. et al. The clinical implications of endothelial dysfunction // J Am Coll Cardiol. 2003. № 42. P. 1149-1160.

20. Widlansky M.E. Shear stress and flow-mediated dilation: all shear responses are not created equally // Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol. 2009. № 296. P. 31-32.